The so-called “Gay Pride” parade took place on July 21, 2007 in San Diego

August 9th, 2007 6:45 pm

So there is this article Brittanie sent my way about the absolute horror that is the annual San Diego Gay Pride Parade. I’ve been to this pride parade several times starting when I was 9 or 10 always accompanied by my mom and close family friends. It has always been fun and celebratory, something I looked forward to. And I was never the only or the youngest child in the crowd. My point is this is a family event. Sure, when large crowds gather there are going to be a couple douchebags. I guess I was just taught how to deal with it, or maybe I’m just not narrow minded enough to let it bother me. I dunno, but this article irritates me.

It refers to a lawsuit 4 San Diego firemen filed against the city because they were ordered to participate in the Gay Pride Parade and had to endure gross sexual harassment or some shit. I agree with them on the grounds that they shouldn’t have been forced to take part in something they object to. I wouldn’t want to take part in a conservative AngloChristianTheLiberalsAreSignalingArmegeddon rally either. To each his or her hermaphroditic own really. But fucking give me a break. A lawsuit wasn’t necessary, a formal complaint and some media coverage maybe, but this is just bullshit, especially on the grounds of sexual harassment.

Here are some quotes from the article.

“During the course of the ensuing three hour long ordeal, the firefighters were subjected to vile sexual taunts from homosexuals lining the parade route. This included the following statements: “show me your hose,” “you can put out my fire,” “you’re making me hot,” “give me mouth-to-mouth,” “you look hungry, why don’t you have a twinkie (from a man wearing a “Girth and Mirth” t-shirt),” and “blow my hose.” These firemen are devoted husbands and fathers.”

  • First off, how do you know all the culprits were the gay? I bet you don’t, I bet that’s just your ass talking. If I were there I probably would have jokingly said a few words too, and I’m not gay.
  • Those “vile sexual taunts” you speak of are harmless. This is where I say so the fuck what and tell you to have a goddamn sense of humor. It’s not like those homos were taunting you with raping your 14 year old son. They were admiring you! Feel good dipshits!
  • And how about the guy who dared to offer you a twinkie while having the audacity to wear a Girth and Mirth shirt? Would it have been sexual harassment if he was wearing a W ‘04 shirt? Didn’t think so.
  • Wait, what? These firemen are devoted husbands AND fathers? Oh. My. God. Wait a second, what does that have to do with anything? Except that many of the people in attendance and in support of the gay community also fit the description.
  • And how does being a husband and father make alleged sexual harassment any worse? That is so fucking patriarchal, attempting to co-opt victimhood on the basis of marriage and fatherhood. The very things that signify patriarchy. You are some crafty fellows.

“The firefighters were subjected to the most vulgar kinds of sexual harassment. To quote one of the firefighters: ‘You could not even look at the crowd without getting some type of sexual gesture.’”

  • Really? The most vulgar kinds of sexual harassment? Rilly? Because as you’ve admitted, they were not physically touched during this “ordeal.” I can think of a billion much worse sexual harassment scenarios.
  • So you look out in the crowd and perceived one giant sexual gesture. Bummer. People are allowed to make sexual gestures, kiss their lovers and have a good time. Get over yourselves. You are the reason I don’t live in the pimple that is San Diego anymore. Good riddance you say. But when the whole fucking city becomes as narrow minded and fearful as you are, watch out.

“This event panders to the most base elements of what is advertised as ‘America’s Finest City’. Even the homosexual community should be outraged and ashamed of the sexual harassment these firemen were forced to endure.”

  • The most base elements. That’s just offensive. Homosexuality is not a base element of human nature. Homosexuals do participate in base elements of human nature, but so do heterosexuals.
  • EVEN the homosexual community should be outraged and ashamed. As though they are so crude and incapable of seeing right from wrong that most things they should be outraged about fly right over their heads. But this perceived sexual attack on four loving husbands and fathers, this THIS they should recognize as unacceptable.

“The firefighters were also targets of gross sexual gestures to include the following: exposure of genitals, blowing kisses, grabbing of the crotch, rubbing of nipples, tongue gestures, men hugging and kissing one another passionately, many of them wearing make-up and dressed like women. Although the firefighters were not physically assaulted, the gestures were clearly directed towards them.”

  • Exposure of the genitals? I bet you could’ve done without that. But are you telling me, in all honesty, that someone actually blew kisses at you? My word, what is the world coming to?
  • As for grabbing of the crotch, rubbing of nipples and tongue gestures this shit is all over TV. Where’s your lawsuit against Viacom?
  • Can you explain to me how men hugging and kissing each other passionately is sexual harassment? Because that one just blows my mind. What if I don’t want to see you and your jesus freak wife making out? Can I sue you for sexual harassment? No? Why not? Exactly.
  • I see you didn’t have a problem with the lesbians making out. Figures.
  • Many of them were wearing makeup and dressed like women huh? Yeah, I can see how that really puts you in a position of powerlessness. Some of them probably were women. Did you think of that? Oh yeah and SO WHAT?
  • So you say you WERE NOT physically assaulted? Then why are we here? If the gestures were clearly directed at you, prove it you whiny bitches.

“This is another example of how radical homosexual activists in positions of authority force their agenda on unwilling citizens.”

  • Are you effing kidding me? What about the radical fundamentalist evangelicals who push their agenda on unwilling citizens? You know, the ones that hold office and um I don’t know, the presidency? FUCK YOU!

So in summary, these firefighters are christian crybabies who have been convinced, through right wing talk radio, that their precious way of life is under attack from muslims and non-right wing christians in general. They had 2 options, participate in the parade or face disciplinary actions. If they have such strong convictions why not choose discipline?

I would feel the same way if the firemen were firewomen. If someone is faced with something they believe is wrong or discipline; the only thing to do is stick by your convictions and deal with the consequences. The language of the document is so belittling and dismissive it’s obvious that this is not so much a case of sexual harassment as homophobia. The only problem seems to be that these admirers were gay men and not women. I have a sneaking suspicion that if this was a generic parade and drunk women were doing and saying the same things, there would be no problem. Their egos would have been stoked and it would have been the end of it.

I’m not trying to say that sexual harassment is ok. All I’m saying is that these men had an option not to attend, granted it was a hard choice to make. They were not subject to ongoing, workplace sexual harassment that was meant to demean and leave them powerless. Damn Brittanie, why you gotta rile me?

PS sorry my blockquotes look so wonky, I had no patience to mess with them. There is supposed to be a large gif of quotation marks so that your eye will be like, Oh this is a quote. But now the quotes are just overshadowed by the bullet points. Whatever. Why am I bringing your attention to this?

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in High Functioning Retards, I'll take a Soapbox Supreme to go. Thanks.

5 Responses

  1. IloveAmerica

    Actually the men were forced to go.

    There WAS a complaint after last years parade by a female fire captain. It was ignored by the fire department. That’s where they made the mistake. They knew there was a problem, so they threatened these guys with discipline if they didn’t participate.

    This parade is overtly sexual in nature and uniformed public safety personnel should have never been forced to participate. But the department knew that and took the risk anyway.

    The firefighters were correct to retain legal counsel.

  2. themillionizer

    i love america too

    and you’re right they shouldn’t have been forced to participate. i must have missed the part where there was a gun to their heads.

  3. Brittanie

    Here’s what I don’t understand. Is there a distinction here between participating in the parade by riding on the float, or participating in the parade as a safety personnel?

    Parades of this size, regardless of what cause they celebrate, often get out of hand. Take any town’s St. Patty’s Day parade, par example, a holiday devoted to the consumption of alcohol. It is necessary for public servants — police and fire personnel — to be present to “keep the peace” as they say and provide for the general welfare of the people. Surely cops and firemen have to deal with drunks who do lewd things like flash them, make immature sexual statements, make out in public, la la la at these parades.

    So, then, would it make the case any different if these four men were at the parade to provide security, as part of their job, and exposed to the behavior they deemed harassment? As opposed to being exposed to it while riding a float? Providing security at the parade would still have been apart of their job, and refusing to do so would have likely brought on the same disciplinary action.

    Do you think the men would have still complained then, even if they were subjected to the same “taunts and obscene bahaviors?”

  4. themillionizer

    brittanie you made a great point and i didn’t fully elaborate on it in the post. i think the answer is no, they probably would not have complained, because it would be in the normal course of their duties. i guess that’s kind of my point though, that as public servants they are constantly in the public eye and therefore subject to any harassment that comes their way. whether it be in the form of gay men or horny housewives. whether it be in the form of clearly being present as a public safety measure or to show support for a community. the pride parades are held in Hillcrest, a large, predominantly gay community in sd.

    i feel like their main complaint was that one: they were forced to participate in something they believe is wrong. two: they were put on display. essentially in a non neutral position. whereas if they were doing crowd control the public wouldn’t necessarily see their presence as supportive. but they still would have received the same treatment, i believe.

    am i making sense?

    anyway, thanks for sending this article my way. i talked to my mom and she said she hasn’t heard anything about it and that she didn’t notice anything out of the ordinary with the fire dept float. she said there were a lot of overtly sexual displays, as always, but definitely tongue in cheek and in a gracious way. i don’t even want to get into what she means by that. i guess she means, that there was nothing going on that she wouldn’t take her 10 year old daughter to. and in terms of parenting my mom was pretty protective.

  5. token

    Man, you guys have the best parades!

Leave a Comment

Hey! Be nice.